Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Luzerne County Election Board Makes Motion for Justice Barrett to Recuse Herself From Pennsylvania Case
Red State ^ | 10/27/2020

Posted on 10/27/2020 7:43:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: kiryandil

I certainly hope it is a “triggering” image...:)


41 posted on 10/27/2020 9:37:34 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Leftism is the plaything of a society with too much time on its hands." - Candace Owens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Uh Oh no more X signatures!


42 posted on 10/27/2020 9:45:13 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Kagan never recused from Obamacare decisions, case closed.


43 posted on 10/27/2020 9:59:01 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents|Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

so, does Luzerne County even have standing in this case?


44 posted on 10/27/2020 10:01:58 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrats should recuse themselves from the human race as they have long ceased to behave like one.


45 posted on 10/27/2020 10:13:22 PM PDT by prophetic (Trump is today's DANIEL. Shut the mouth of lions Lord, let his enemies be the Cat Food instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good Luck with that!


46 posted on 10/27/2020 11:35:27 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

The motion defames POTUS for acting within his Constitutional purview and choosing her.
The motion defames the US Senate, who voted to approve her.
The motion ASSUMES she would rule opposite their desire in the case.

I think the litigant filing the motion should vacate their position in the case, as a whole.


47 posted on 10/28/2020 3:01:45 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As per tradition around here ;), without having read through the article, ;)

My first thought, based on the headline is:

“Um, NO.”


48 posted on 10/28/2020 2:58:49 PM PDT by proud American in Canada (In these trying times, "Give me Liberty or Give me Death!"l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson