If they can't complete vote signature comparison, they may have to forego unverifiable mail-ins and be forced to go with just the in-persons and sig-certified absentees only just to get into the EC count at all.
If challenge goes all the way uo the USSC and Amy Coney Barrett is seated, we might see mail-ins discounted simply on the basis of 14th Amendment equal protection of voters rights grounds.
If (D)'sexperience a rout, they will only have themselves to blame, and the long knives will be out for those tacticians responsible for the failed strategy.
FReegards!
I was so looking forward to a repeat of RBG's stern advocacy of state's rights in Bush v Gore, but alas, that laughable burden will fall upon the wise Latina perhaps.
"Justice Ginsburgs dissent put her in an unusual position: arguing against an equal protection claim. She thought the court should have respected the principles of federalism and abided by the ruling of the Florida Supreme Court, letting the recount go forward unobstructed."
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Agamemnon wrote:
“Trump’s lawyers intend to check/compare every signature on the mail-ins. Very time consuming. If it can’t get done and certify before EC votes ~ Dec 13, the state risks not being counted in the EC tally.
If they can’t complete vote signature comparison, they may have to forego unverifiable mail-ins and be forced to go with just the in-persons and sig-certified absentees only just to get into the EC count at all.
If challenge goes all the way uo the USSC and Amy Coney Barrett is seated, we might see mail-ins discounted simply on the basis of 14th Amendment equal protection of voters rights grounds.
If (D)’s experience a rout, they will only have themselves to blame, and the long knives will be out for those tacticians responsible for the failed strategy.
FReegards!”
Thanks for this info!
Takes care of the cheaters...