No...
I was not referring to that...
Thought I made it clear, that I was referring to the actual texts and their wording...
Nothing in the language, imagery, or what was proposed was "offensive"...
The communist jerk is a certified scumbag (as is every single communist or serf who votes for him), but the test messages are simply teenager texts...
What would have been "offensive" would have been a Wiener_licious sexting message...
Shocked that they were not...
Agreed that they are not “offensive” insofar as the language used. They are offensive in the sense that they offend traditional morality ...a married man is being unfaithful to his wife and family, and would risk very public exposure of them to his shame/scandal. But since the general morality is degraded, they probably are not as offensive in this regard as well.
The content of the messages do seem quite juvenile too. Raises the question about his judgement and maturity... Cal, who (according to his campaign literature delivered into my mailbox yesterday) “was awarded one of the Army’s top honors for taking on corruption in Iraq.”
There is more underneath this story than the texts. The left media in NC is not going to inquire ... it is going to bury it as best as they can. They should be comparing it to John Edwards and his affair, and why they believe good old Cal, who is using his uniform as a prop, is entitled to stay in the race.