Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

You take your car to the shop. They tell you that your water pump needs to be replaced. You decide not to replace it and keep adding fluid to your radiator. When your car breaks down, do you blame the auto manufacturer for a faulty water pump? How about the repair shop for not insisting that you need to replace the water pump?

If a POS vendor tells a retailer they have to cut support until a vulnerability, do you think the retailer insists on continuing to use that payment source? I guarantee they’re going to insulate themselves from liability, to hell what the public thinks.

I’m just saying that there are likely technical reasons for the change. It’s not done to spite you. It’s done to protect them.


51 posted on 09/27/2020 11:01:27 AM PDT by rarestia (Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia

If Walmart really cared and wanted Samsung pay still, they would have it. They aren’t your run of the mill retail client and thwir POS provider is not going to be allowed to go in and add or take away payment options on their own particular whim or preference.


52 posted on 09/27/2020 11:48:29 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson