Why don't Conservatives call it a disproven theory??
1 posted on
09/24/2020 8:56:54 AM PDT by
kathsua
To: kathsua
“Why don’t Conservatives call it a disproven theory??”
Whenever Conservatives speak, the ears of leftists fall off.
3 posted on
09/24/2020 8:59:59 AM PDT by
LottieDah
(If Biden/Harris wins, America loses.)
To: kathsua
He covered one greenhouse with a sheet of transparent rock salt and the other with a sheet of glass. How did he prevent the rock salt dissolving in the rain?
4 posted on
09/24/2020 9:01:59 AM PDT by
JimRed
(TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: kathsua
5 posted on
09/24/2020 9:06:30 AM PDT by
HippyLoggerBiker
(Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake.)
To: kathsua
Those who claim that CO2 molecules in the atmosphere can cause heating by trapping IR have yet to provide any empirical scientific evidence to prove such a physical process exists. CO2 prevents some IR from instantly escaping to space.
To: kathsua
Physics, and by extension science in general, was once called, “Natural philosophy.” Hence, scientists receives “Philosophy Doctorates,” or PhDs. Eventually, the term covered liberal arts as well, but Philosophical Magazine was a fine name for a science magazine.
8 posted on
09/24/2020 9:12:41 AM PDT by
dangus
To: kathsua
"Why don't Conservatives call it a disproven theory??" What? That greenhouses work? Because it's not disproven. They work all over the world.
One person's old experiment doesn't disprove anything. Especially something in such every day usage.
9 posted on
09/24/2020 9:17:44 AM PDT by
mlo
To: kathsua
13 posted on
09/24/2020 11:15:52 AM PDT by
phs3
(MAGA - Winning a little more every day!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson