Perhaps I missed it in both of those links but neither seems to prove the assertion he doesn’t own the site. Just “well-informed” speculation which on the internet is just a farting sound.
There has been a lot on Twitter but months ago. I wish I’d have saved the links. You can do your own research. It was a sale that involved his father’s business and an agreement with google advertisers.
Don’t you think it’s pretty good at least circumstantial evidence by how far Left the site has gone that it’s not Matt running it?
Common sense.