Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: amorphous
A 172 flys slower, and its gear will absorb more impact, plus you can see where you’re landing. :)

The things that you mention are inaccurate and/or basically meaningless. A Cherokee 140 has a stall speed of 48 knots when the flaps are down and a Cessna 172 has a stall speed of 48 knots when the flaps are down, so which one flies slower? The pilots view of the terrain ahead is approximately the same when coming in for a landing. And the gear sticking down below the fuselage on a high wing aircraft means you are much more likely to turn the the higher centered gravity on its nose when those little tires hit rough terrain.

I suppose that we could go round and round on this type of meaningless argument. Cherokees have approximately the same safety record as Cessna 172s when compared with pilots of similar levels of experience.

28 posted on 09/08/2020 9:32:20 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: fireman15
which one flies slower?

The one with the higher payload when flown lightly loaded.

A 172N stall with flaps is 4 knots slower than your 140 at gross, and you can hold the nose up longer. I would much rather take a 172 into a soft field over a 140, any-day.

35 posted on 09/08/2020 9:55:46 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson