At least here in the USofA, we have a written Constitution that we can argue over rather than some vague notion that must bend to will of politicians willy nilly.
I voted for NoName. He was on the ballot in all states, which means that he was deemed to be qualified for the Office of the President. Since he was born of two U.S. Citizens and his father was on active duty as a Commissioned Officer of the U.S. Navy serving in Panama as a consequence of official orders, a rationale person would assume that he was a natural born citizen, but the courts have been silent on that point, so we will never know for sure. The arguments will continue forever, and no one who counts will ever settle them.
Thank you for proving my point, again.
Wherever you have ambiguity with respect to natural born Citizen status, the person is not a natural born Citizen.
The fact No Name was on a ballot is not relevant.
When you rely on man made law, statue, or SCOTUS decisions you are Naturalized, and there is nothing wrong about that.
When you have a small group of Senators stroking their chins, reading the Canal treaty, and trying to justify the Panama Canal Zone as part of the USA, you are a Naturalized Citizen.