Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Owen

So, if somebody were sick in the past and recovered, then an RT-PCR test should show negative. Right?

In other words, the big increase in testing will only reveal currently-infected people and whether they had the disease in the past is irrelevant.


23 posted on 06/28/2020 9:38:05 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

Again, generally correct.

A recovered patient is defined as recovered via 2 consecutive negative PCR tests 24 hrs apart. If those are the test results, Negative is the declaration. It takes more than 1 negative to be told to leave quarantine. Note this is only if there was a previous Positive.

A person that walks in with zero history and tests Negative is declared Negative. Only if Positive before that does it require 2 Negatives.

There are cases on record, not many but definitely not absurdly rare, where a Recovered patient leaves quarantine and is tested again a few weeks later and is Positive. The hope is he did not get re-infected. There is hope the swab is picking up viral segments from the original infection and not an active virus.

But . . . there are a few such cases that presented with symptoms. Those suggested re-infection and that’s very bad. It means immunity was short longevity.


25 posted on 06/28/2020 9:55:19 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson