Tucker Carlson: Why Won’t Republicans Investigate Big Tech Monopolies?

DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

[US Navy Vet]

Follow the $s!

[Aggie65]

In most cases, the only difference in a republican in the house or senate and a democrat is the (D) in front of hte democrat and (R) in front of the Republican. The Republicans in the Senate and the house actually want the democrats to take over and actually get a veto proof majority and pass Obama Care again and campaign for the 8 campaigns against it and as long as they get about 40% of the spoils, they don’t have to do anything.

[ncalburt]

Follow the money .
Rubio , Lee, McCarthy, .plus many more .... all-owned by Silicon Valley..

[oincobx]

If Section 230 is repealed, can FreeRepublic be held liable for the postings of its users?

[ncalburt]

Money .
Lee Rubio Tillis McCarthy to name a few owned Silicon Valley .

[DaxtonBrown]

“Harry Reid is from Nevada. Why would he face bribery charges in Utah?”

Reid was taking money everywhere. Check City loan sharks, their president was from Utah. Poker Stars and Full Tilt Poker, various connections. A Utah train system. Skinwalker Ranch, UFO bribes to Bigelow Aerospace.

[sauropod]

Bkmk

[metmom]

Cause they are complicit and getting paid off.

[RobertoinAL]

Tucker, Tucker, Tucker. You assume that the Republicans have a set of BALZ!

[1Old Pro]

Now, Google has already shown a disturbing willingness to distort reality for ideological ends. And now it is happening. Google is acting directly to shape what people can say and what they’re allowed to speak. It’s a direct effort to stifle free speech. All of that is even truer today. So why hasn’t the Congress done anything about this? Well, we’d love to ask Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. We invited him on the show. He would not come. We’ve invited him before, he would not come then.

Invite Mike Lee again and again and announce every night that he won't come on.

[King_Corey]

Cowardice.

[1Old Pro]

If Section 230 is repealed, can FreeRepublic be held liable for the postings of its users? No, apples and oranges

[boxlunch]

CCP-Run Newspaper ‘China Daily’ Paid American Media $19M to Publish Propaganda |CCP Virus |COVID-19.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrg8-3L6Boc

Although I don’t know why they bothered, American media would gladly publish their propaganda for free since the media is a faithful enthusiastic arm of the Demcheviks in America.

[oincobx]

>>>If Section 230 is repealed, can FreeRepublic be held liable for the postings of its users? No, apples and oranges

Are you suggesting that Section 230 does not currently protect FR from lawsuits? Can someone bring a defamation suit against FR for what a user posts?

[aimhigh]

The quality of a representative government will never exceed the quality of the press.