Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

“The whole threat of slavery in the territories was just an astro turf fake concern meant to panic people into voting against the Southern states in their representation.”

That is from the point of view of the territories. To the South, it wasn’t a threat but a promise. Perhaps a fatuous one, but try telling Don Quixote that he’s fighting a windmill. It was their hope, and you’re caught up on whether that hope was realistic or not.


251 posted on 06/17/2020 5:06:08 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 ("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5
To the South, it wasn’t a threat but a promise.

I'm pretty sure Southern cotton growers knew they couldn't make any money with slaves in the territories. They knew what was required in terms of land and water and labor and transport to grow and market cotton, and they certainly weren't fooled by the hype of "slavery in the territories."

And they were the dominant force in Southern politics at the time. If they allowed people to believe what they believed, it was because it suited their purpose to allow people to believe it.

This "expansion into the territories" is a straw which so many want to grasp to justify supporting the New York coalition which virtually controlled Congress at the time.

Powerful group of New York liars astroturfs the nation in an effort to retain power? Do you watch the news nowadays?

267 posted on 06/18/2020 6:00:04 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson