Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith
Except for the fact that the pro slavery argument was coming from the Democrats and they anti slavery position was held by the Republicans.

This is an illusion. The Republicans pretended to be against slavery, but they were really against the "expansion" of slavery. They were fine with it continuing to exist in the places where it existed, they just didn't want it getting any more representation in Congress.

This massive disagreement became a national political conflict, and then a civil war.

So we have been led to believe, but the schism was more about representation in Congress than it was about actual slavery. It's been prettied up to make it look like altruism, but in reality it was all self interest.

213 posted on 06/17/2020 6:09:08 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

No, your version is an illusion.

The deep state progressives have been deceiving almost everyone for the past century.

Imagine what it’s like to be in a “management” position for the progressives. There’s no way you’d allow the truth to stand. Being pro slavery doesn’t look good, especially when you lose the war you fought for it, and they figured that one out pretty fast.


226 posted on 06/17/2020 10:47:15 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson