Indeed.
When people including me jumped on his suggestion to invite Black Lives Matter into the situation, he got defensive and said he wasn't advocating violence.
I thought it was ignorant of him to make that claim, because that is what they do. It is their job to inflame and incite. Paid hundreds of millions by the Ford Foundation, Soros Open Society entities, and lots of businesses who used to pay protection money to Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition in the hope of avoiding being branded as racists with picketers outside their corporate headquarters.
In my part of the country, I see churches-yes, churches-with huge Black Lives Matter banners strung over the entrance, 30-40 feet wide.
A lot of people piled on that guy, rightfully so, and he wrote an opus that last I looked was going on three hundred posts.
The whole premise of Black Lives Matters is a sham.
In this short 7 minute video by Bill Whittle, he really explains a lot (and gets a lot of its derived data from the link to Heather MacDonald at the Wall Street Journal, who did the number crunching on the federally supplied numbers to reach her conclusions):
Any time the narrative comes up where there it is asserted there is an epidemic of black men being shot by police officers, here is the statistic that should lead off the ensuing conversation:
This poster said that the issue wasn't about race and that my post was race baiting, and the best I can do is assume he doesn't know that the hullabaloo is ALL about race, at least from a mechanics perspective, and Black Lives Matter is racist at its core, operating under a racist delusion.
Underneath it is about Leftists acting out in a desperate attempt to change society as they have been losing power. These people don't give a crap about the lives of black men, if they did, they would raise their voices at the carnage in blue cities.