It sounds like someone loaded 10 potato guns with conspiracy theory shit and is firing them all at a wall to see what will stick.
We should always aspire to directly consider the evidence and not immediately attempt to resort to CIA-weaponized language. That includes, of course “conspiracy theory” as if someone is properly demanding that the speaker first needs to get that crazy monkey off his back before his or her real evidence may be considered.
Your approach is a lot like a manifestation of humblegunner’s standard tact, despite this not being a blogger’s post to get traffic.