Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PGR88

Never attracted to her look. Slit-eyed most of the time in photos. Kinda ‘fluffy’ in the thighs. Has a look on her face that she’s not the brightest girl in the 10th grade.

You of course are welcome to your opinion. REM: my opinion is about her ‘look,’ not her as a person.


4 posted on 01/15/2020 10:06:01 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag

by today’s Hollywood standards she would be sent to get lipo and a breast enhancement


6 posted on 01/15/2020 10:07:40 AM PST by AbolishCSEU (Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Blueflag

Yes, Marilyn Monroe and her look were before my time. That cellulite on her behind would be a career-killer today, and to be a “sex-kitten” nowadays she’d have to be getting in the sewer to compete with the likes of Nicki Minaj or Cardi B.


11 posted on 01/15/2020 10:11:41 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Blueflag

I’m only not attracted to her because I am hetero. But to me she is naturally gorgeous with a baby shaped face. And her aura on film is very sweet and attractive too. She was oversexed too young which kind of makes sexuality permeate everything you do. So that was part of her appeal as well.


42 posted on 01/15/2020 12:06:52 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson