Who?
I think this schtick of your’s is misguided.
Objecting to theft is misguided?
I am sure every time you try to stop people from doing that, George Stephanopoulos and all the other leftist shitheads are glad to see you do it.
I really doubt that any of those folks care if I point out stolen material or not.
if everybody conservative flooded the news zone with sites offering conservative news
That's not the issue here.
This dude wants hits on his blog and he's stolen material to serve that end.
It's really simple.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/brian-mancini-brain-how-ieds-may-be-physically-causing-ptsd/
He was an Army soldier who was horribly wounded in Iraq, made it back to normalcy, founded a charity, and then fell afoul of the massive domestic surveillance op running in the US. They basically hounded him until he committed suicide, and then they blamed it on his brain injury. There was a rumor going around CIA was running some sort of MK Ultra-like experiment on brainwashing on soldiers with various parts of their brains injured down where he was, to see how different parts of the brain being taken out of the equation would affect the ability to control people. Somehow his charity may have put him on top of it, and he may have seen something. Or he was just like the thousands of others who see gangstalking for seemingly no reason. Either way.
I assume you know who Michael Hastings was. He was the Rolling Stone reporter who did the piece on McCrystal, who ran to his neighbor’s house, saying he had to flee, but he was afraid his surveillance had tampered with his car, so he wanted to borrow hers. Her’s was in the shop, so he took his own, and the last video of him was from a restaurant surveillance camera which caught an explosion under his car that launched his engine a few hundred feet, before the car impacted a tree and burned him to death beyond recognition.
Everybody was seeing the surveillance these days. Even Scalia complained he was under it before his “passing.”
On the blogs, pointing people to stories of interest isn’t theft, especially if it is done to try and affect the political narratives out there. Drudge singlehandedly shifted the needle right by simply pointing links to other stories, getting a readership, and then pointing that readership to more and more rightward stories once they were following him. Free Republic too, BTW. Both were seminal to who I am politically today. Imagine if all I had was CBS or CNN. I might not even have my own surveillance detail.
The more sites we have out there aggregating content on our side, the more those sites can shift their aggregations rightward, remove the fake news from in front of people, and the better it is for our side and the Holy God Emperor.
If you are worried about them making money or profiting, I assure you none of them are making money unless they are intel-backed, or have a bot out there clicking their ads to run up a bill. I do it for my readers, and my site is nothing but a money drain, and probably always will be.
People don’t understand, there is no money in blogs. Even the mainstream media like National Review would go bankrupt if it weren’t on the payroll of some major moneyed interests.
I just imagine what would happen if you managed to dissuade Drudge all those years back when he was just doing a small newsletter like this, and how it might have changed the nature of the Impeachment drama, and everything since then. Or if you had shut down JimRob when this site began by posting news stories and links. Because somebody you are crossing paths with here might be one of them someday, if they hang in there and don’t quit.
You’re gonna do what you’re gonna do, but I felt a need to make the case.