Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All 3 Moody Models Confirm Trump Will Have Landslide VICTORY In 2020 – Here Are The Numbers
Conservative US ^ | 12.26.2019 | Natalie D.

Posted on 12/26/2019 3:52:29 PM PST by USA Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: JBW1949
Do not vote for any democrat, no matter who...

Thanks for the advice. Not sure it'll be useful here in FR. MY ego go spread the word at DU.

41 posted on 12/26/2019 5:21:18 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

I swear I can watch that all day!


42 posted on 12/26/2019 5:26:32 PM PST by Dogbert41 (Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative

In 2020 the real election is for State Rep and State Senator. They will control the re-mapping of both the state and Congressional districts.

Everything we do to help our friends there will help Trump. But if we focus only on Trump, it will not help down ballot much.


43 posted on 12/26/2019 5:26:36 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative

I don’t count on a anything until Trumps gives his acceptance speech.
Anything can happen between now and then. I also don’t believe these articles. They make it sound like Trumps a shoe in and all the conservatives won’t go out and vote


44 posted on 12/26/2019 5:26:54 PM PST by setter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

What I was alluding to was for people in FR to get the word OUT not to vote for any democrat...I didn’t just mean people in here...

Sorry I wasn’t very clear about it....


45 posted on 12/26/2019 5:27:56 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I checked...It is not accepted as legitimate word...considered irregular or non-standard...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless

Irregardless is a word sometimes used in place of regardless or irrespective, which has caused controversy since the early twentieth century, though the word appeared in print as early as 1795.[1] Most dictionaries list it as non-standard or incorrect usage, and recommend that “regardless” should be used instead.[2][3][4]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless

s irregardless a word?: Usage Guide
Irregardless was popularized in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its increasingly widespread spoken use called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.


46 posted on 12/26/2019 5:32:28 PM PST by classyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

How many who post abouy election fraud actually get involved ahead of time to stop it?

Or to document it first hand so we have sopmething to present to the US Attorneys appointed by Trump?

Do not post about 2020 election fraud unless you are going to do something about it.


47 posted on 12/26/2019 5:32:57 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: classyconservative
It is still a word. Language changes.

How Far Back In Time Could You Go, And Still Understand English?

The short answer there is to about 1400.

If new words and changes in words are illegitimate then we do not speak English. Everything we say now would be complete gibberish to an Englishman 600 years ago. Or perhaps you would hold that they didn't speak English?

48 posted on 12/26/2019 5:50:04 PM PST by TigersEye (MAGA - 16 more years! - KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

Awesome!


49 posted on 12/26/2019 5:53:35 PM PST by TrueFact (Don't hang out with narcissists or dems...but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

And then little transgender unicorns pop out of everyone’s arse. I’m sure that’s someone’s fantasy in the basement of Democrat Underground, but if they imagine that it’ll fly with the American public - well, I wouldn’t put much of a wager on their ultimate success.


50 posted on 12/26/2019 5:55:07 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Why not???

My guess is several in here may be poll watchers...

Are you one???

There’s not a thing wrong with bringing it up in and reminding everyone to be aware that it could and has happened...


51 posted on 12/26/2019 5:58:47 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Democrats have criminalized honest elections.

Criminal Election Model 269 to 269.


52 posted on 12/26/2019 6:00:58 PM PST by TheNext (Universal Skeptic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative

He needs a congress to pass all kinds of legislation as well. That is just as important as him winning next year.

No RINOs, but a conservative congress!


53 posted on 12/26/2019 6:04:48 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal (Like Enoch, Noah, & Lot, the True Church will soon be removed & then destruction comes forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative
All 3 Moody Models...


54 posted on 12/26/2019 6:06:01 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative

2020 was never going to be close. Folks claiming this thing is a race are fools. Before the #seinfeldimpeachment the best case for Dems was around 15 states... after it their best case may not even be 10.


55 posted on 12/26/2019 6:11:02 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It is listed as non-standard in all the sources I checked...
I brought you 2 sources...There are more.

I suggest you read article below...written by a lexicographer for Webster. This article actually supports that it is a word—a passionate use of “regardless;” a combination of “irrespective” and “regardless”...However, the last paragraph states:

The point of the “irregardless” is to shut down conversation. So “irregardless” is a word. It has a specific use, in particular dialects. That said, it’s not part of standard English and so — especially if you’re writing or if you’re speaking in formal places — you want to use “regardless” instead. Because if you use “irregardless,” people will think you’re uneducated.

https://www.businessinsider.com/irregardless-real-word-regardless-kory-stamper-education-dictionary-mean-girls-lexicon-merriam-webster-2017-6

The last paragraph supports the reasons that I don’t advocate using “irregardless;” it is non-standard, only used in specific dialects, and can make the user seem uneducated.

BTW, I was called on using the term “irregardless” in college, and I never forgot it. Later, I taught college business English and instructed students to use “regardless.”


56 posted on 12/26/2019 6:14:33 PM PST by classyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: classyconservative
Later, I taught college business English and instructed students to use “regardless.”

Ah, I see where you're coming from.

57 posted on 12/26/2019 6:21:01 PM PST by TigersEye (MAGA - 16 more years! - KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative

When Hillary Clinton sees this post, she will raise her hand and say PICK ME>


58 posted on 12/26/2019 6:38:29 PM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative

Well sure, especially since they look like they’re gonna’ run that smelly old communist in the rumpled suit.


59 posted on 12/26/2019 6:49:52 PM PST by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
It’s going to be the same as 2016.

Trump will pick up Minnesota.

Larger margins in the swing states, otherwise, yeah, the same.

60 posted on 12/26/2019 7:10:31 PM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson