Posted on 12/12/2019 7:16:07 PM PST by Usually_Disappointed
There was a story on here earlier today from NY Mag that claimed the prosecutor Biden got fired in the Ukraine wasn't investigating Burisma. I can't find it in keyword search. Can anyone point me in the direction of that story?
Thanks!
Thanks!
That report would be contrary to Biden’s own word in the CFR video where he brags about getting his son’s prosecutor fired.
Is this the article?:
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/12/hunter-biden-is-the-new-hillary-clinton-email-server.html
Was it NY Magazine or The People’s Daily?
Yes! Thank you very much for the help!
The reason I asked is I wanted to send these two articles to a friend to point out media bias.
CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin says Trump ‘in a way, has already won’ impeachment fight
Fox News ^ | December 12, 2019 | Sam Dorman
...
Republicans have continually pointed to the younger Biden in response to the controversy surrounding the president’s relationship with Ukraine. Hunter Biden served on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas firm when his father pressured the Eastern European nation to fire its top prosecutor, who happened to be investigating that firm.
Hunter Biden Is the New Hillary Clinton Email Server
By Jonathan Chait
...
The appearance of impropriety is that Hunter Biden made money from Burisma, a Ukrainian firm, at a time when Joe Biden was directing the administrations Ukraine policy, creating the appearance that Burisma bought Joe Bidens favor. Indeed, President Trump has relentlessly charged that Burisma did in fact buy Bidens favor. This is false. Biden demanded the firing of notoriously ineffectual prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who, at the time, was not investigating Burisma.
Not true, you need to do some research and Shokin was investigated Burisma and other things and Biden wanted him out of the way or no money. He was NOT ineffectual, quite the opposite hence the threat from Biden basically Shokin is gone of no funds flow
You know, Quid pro Joe
I was just referring to the 2 snippets of articles I posted. One says specifically that the prosecutor was looking into Burisma and the other says exactly the opposite.
These are facts and not opinions. They can’t both be accurate.
It appears to me what the consensus IC and State Dept wanted protected by firing the new sheriff wasnt little Hunter ( a millionish a year) it was Soros interests ( billions or trillions, and in the end erasing European culture, etc). That would be why slowJoe boasted about taking out the prosecutor without for a second feeling it might be viewed as self serving.
You may well be correct—Joe is _that_ stupid—but he knew that getting rid of the prosecutor had a side benefit of protecting his son (and therefore himself).
He figured the CFR folks (who literally _own_ the mass media) would never let a scandal get near him.
You may well be correct—Joe is _that_ stupid—but he knew that getting rid of the prosecutor had a side benefit of protecting his son (and therefore himself).
He figured the CFR folks (who literally _own_ the mass media) would never let a scandal get near him.
We're talking 11 on a scale of 10 - for BOTH piles of dog squeezins.
Burisma and other items including the bank that was involved in the movement of the 7.9 Billion that vaporized and ended up in others hands including the company Bidens son was part of, Rosemont. I follow this all very closely
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.