Yeah, I overreact at times. A well documented failing... I’m working on it.
Otherwise, I believe we’re having a major communication disconnect, and I sense that it ain’t me that don’t get it.
The middle part of my previous post was an excerpt from the warning. I didn’t add the word “children” to this discussion.
Secondly, the First Amendment limits government power only, and does not apply in any sense to websites, discussion forums, or private property.
As I’ve indicated before, my understanding of the warning was that the website moderators wanted to specifically avoid any posts referring to “porch monkeys” or the like. That’s a sentiment that I can get behind. It adds nothing to the conversation and discredits the opinions of anyone posting it. It also needlessly slanders innocent men and women who are not part of the thug culture.
Nothing whatever to do with political correctness nor cowardice. It’s a stand I’m taking for truth, justice, and the American way
...and you may take that as an apology for the unnecessary profanity.
I understand. Me too.
Nonetheless, I remain steadfast in my opinion that the bus driver is a coward. He did not stop and just kept moving on. Why? Likely the policy of non-interference and he risks firing if he stepped in. So, the bus driver made clear that he values his school bus driver job over the well-being, possibly life, of that poor kid.
IMHO, he should have stepped up and protected the kid. If stopping a sever beating that could likely end up with a seriously injured, possibly crippled or murdered.
I’m thinking I’m not the one that doesn’t get it. We disagree and that’s okay. Disagreeing reasonably without hostility and personal attacks makes us better men than the political left.
See you around the web and are you a real Scot?