Posted on 12/11/2019 10:18:00 AM PST by pilgrim
I don’t know why you are arguing with me...
Horowitz can and should have sent criminal referrals.
Stop with the "headline is clickbait" nonsense.
I just laughed when I heard he had written "no bias" in what these anti-American scum tried to do to a duly elected POTUS.
Nothing will change.
You're right about that.
Bias is also the motive.
Cruz is laying out a clear case of political bias right now- he’s doign a very good job too- the left have no answer to the obvious political bias that was displayed-
Agree. “Bias” is a misnomer in this case. Gives the impression of a “leaning,” sort of. The French Commune wasn’t “biased.” Neither were the Russian Bolsheviks. They were very clear-minded about what they wanted.
Klobuchar no political bias on certain situations.
Omitted in the report is the following.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Inspector General’s Report from the Department of Justice (DOJ) features a heretofore unheralded costar by the name of Bruce Swartz, the assistant attorney general in the Criminal Division. Swartz was also the supervisor of the feckless Bruce Ohr, husband of Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Ohr and frequent breakfast buddy of Christopher Steele of Steele dossier fame.
Unreported by Inspector General Michael Horowitz, however, was Swartz’s starring role in another DoJ drama some 15 years earlier. Given the scant media attention the case received in 2004-2005, it is possible Horowitz did not even know about Swartz’s yeoman effort to save Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger from a lengthy sojourn in a federal Supermax.
“We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations,” reported Horowitz. Had the IG been able to compare Swartz’s protection of Berger to his pursuit of one-time Trump adviser Paul Manafort, the evidence would have kicked him in the teeth.
Horowitz and his report don’t really say that. He didn’t have direct testimony or documents stating that investigations were OPENED for a political reason. He certainly leaves open the possibility.
Dead little girls and live little boys will make people say and do ANYTHING! (John Roberts)
It is the ONE thing that people will do absolutely ANYTHING to keep it a secret.
“17 mistakes all in favor of one political party against one political opponent does not to a reasonable person equate to mistakes or no political bias....17-0”
************************************************************
Flip a quarter 17 times, if it comes up heads every time somebody gonna be checking out that quarter. Truly random happenstance it ain’t. Of course, when all 17 FBI “mistakes” are anti Trump we have to accept that it was all entirely random. Uh huh.
yeah the whole thing stinks- they know darn well it was absolutely politically motivated by bias- yet the left sit there and lie through their teeth
I hope the Lord exposes their blatant lies in such a way that democrats lose the midterms bigtime-
I watched it - Wordsmithing - The investigation was opened because the criteria to start an investigation is very low. Papadopulus siad that he heard that the Russians might have Hillary emails to a Friendly Foreign Diplomat (the mtgs were set ups, but the investigation started w/o bias).
BUT Once the investigation was an open file, the gang that ran the investigation totally went off the rails as Trump predators. Barr gave a great interview w/ NBC the other day
Sasse is making sense now.
Not sure the trust of any alphabet gov entity will ever be restored for me!
But it is a thought crime and hard to prove
Best to stick with facts
Agree!!!
The Senators were bandying about “spying or surveillance”
In TRUTH it was “espionage.” An espionage operation that did NOT succeed, only by the Grace of God. That’s why Trump was not properly briefed, either as a candidate or as President.
HEADS MUST ROLL.
Stop. Watching. Fox.
I honestly believe this is a big case and big cases can take a while to be made.
Look at the democrats
They are making cases out of nothing with evidence that doesn’t exist
They will fail
I want our cases to succeed and real people go to real jail
Bill Barr knows what he is doing
Even small easy political corruption charges take two to three years to build and prosecute
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.