[VanDeKoik]

>You are an idiot. At least 10 lower Obama judge injunctions have been overturned in the SCOTUS

So?

According to you, Trump can just “IGNORE” all of it (because reasons), and that a judge is somehow just making rulings on his own as the plaintiff, so he has to be the one to go to another judge or some convoluted nonsense you were pushing.

Trump instead wants it to have the weight of LAW on his side (you know, the 10 overturns by SCOTUS), and not just a windbag’s pronouncements online that he can just pretend these legal maneuverings dont exist.

I can guarantee you that you sure as hell were not complaining when lawsuits were brought against Obama and his administration, and you were likely not saying that Obama ought to just ignore the rulings that came out against him.

So how about you stop with the fantasy, and deal with reality town?

[central_va]

According to you, Trump can just “IGNORE” all of it (because reasons), and that a judge is somehow just making rulings on his own as the plaintiff, so he has to be the one to go to another judge or some convoluted nonsense you were pushing.

You only read what you wanted to read and then stopped. I said that he should ignore the injunction UNTIL SCOTUS either rules in favor of the injunction or against it. Get it?

[central_va]

Explain where in the Constitution the President has to follow a court ordered injunction by a lower federal court judge?