Posted on 11/25/2019 7:49:12 PM PST by jfd1776
Born in Valparaiso, Chile, on November 25, 1915, the great Latin American leader, General Augusto Pinochet.
The very idea of referring to a Latin American ruler as great is a rarity. So many of the rulers south of the United States have been vicious, not just recently, but since ancient times. From the Incas and Aztecs of old to the Fidel Castros and Nicholas Maduros of the present, Central and South American rule has traditionally resulted in permanent poverty, usually awash in blood.
Augusto Pinochet is the exception.
He ruled from the date of his coup détat, September 11, 1973, through his semi-retirement in 1988 (and remained a senator for life thereafter). He is universally reviled, primarily for his success in driving Communism out of his country. Today, Chile is about the only stable, prosperous major country in Latin America, primarily because of Pinochets reforms and the Left will forever hate him for it.
The Left adored Pinochets predecessor, Salvador Allende, because he brought Socialism to Chile, with the intent of joining the Soviet orbit as a Communist nation. Pinochet led a military coup in 1973, with a goal of not only overturning Allende, but of inoculating Chile from Communism forever.
The Left immediately started calling Pinochet a Fascist, but outside of his military uniform, nothing could be further from the truth. His economic reforms were designed by the team of Milton Friedmans best students, hired away from the University of Chicago, and their goal was the opposite of Fascism: to privatize the nations retirement funds, to reduce bureaucracy, to stabilize currency, essentially, to make Chile a free country, the freest economy in Latin America.
With this record of success, who does the Left vilify? Augusto Pinochet, who brought prosperity to his nation
And who does the Left champion? Hugo Chavez, Lula da Silva, Che Guevara The Communists, corruptocrats and mass murderers who have long consigned the many millions of Latin Americans to generational, inescapable poverty.
Pinochet stands alone as one who recognized the dangers of Communism and acted with determination. At a time when others in Latin America sought advisers from Soviet Russia, Pinochet hired advisers from the United States.
Think of the world of 1973, and consider the choices made by Central and South American leaders in those days. Soviet Communism had already murdered tens of millions of its own. The killing fields of Cambodia were still fresh in everyones mind... Chairman Maos cultural revolution in Red China was just getting underway, with tens of millions more victims yet to be killed. And still, from Western academics to Third World rulers, the path of communism was a delight. and remains a delight, despite the historical record, for so many millions of western fools even today.
Almost 50 years after his coup, the modern Left still doubles down on its hatred of Pinochet. They attack him for dealing out capital punishment to Communists, refusing to admit to themselves that Communism is itself the most severe form of capital punishment ever inflicted upon this world.
In the 20th century, Communist rule killed a hundred million people. No natural disaster hurricane, earthquake, tornado, or volcanic eruption can hold a candle to the devastation caused by Socialism. And no disease from plague to AIDS can even come close. Communism is itself a death sentence.
Pinochet almost single-handedly transformed his country into a modern representative republic, blessed with limited government and a path to prosperity that few others south of the United States have ever enjoyed. If his methods were sometimes severe (a couple thousand communists executed without the full benefit of civilian trials), it was because he believed it necessary. And in fact, surveying the surrounding countries in the years since, it is hard to disagree with his decision.
Here in the United States, we dont even execute mass murderers anymore Speck, Manson, and so many others have been allowed to die of natural causes in prison, decades after murdering their innocent victims. Perhaps, sometimes, we are too kind. Pinochet looked at Pol Pots Cambodia, Hitlers Germany, Stalins Russia, and decided not to make the mistake of being too kind. He did the best he could to cut out the cancer in his beloved nation.
Today, we see the popular culture champion the advocates of mass murder Ruth Bader Ginsburg, abortions biggest advocate since the eugenicist Margaret Sanger, is held up on a podium as a heroic role model for young women. Jack Kevorkian, inventor of the oxymoron assisted suicide, was a pop-culture hero for the Left. The bloodthirsty monster Che Guevara has his visage emblazoned on the T-shirts of impressionable youths.
It is long past time to redeem the memory of Augusto Pinochet. Fifteen years before the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Iron Curtain, Augusto Pinochet saved Chile from the Soviet orbit, dealing a needed blow to Leonid Brezhnevs evil record of so many successful conquests.
General Pinochet was a hero. Thank Heaven for putting him in Chile when his country needed him.
Copyright 2019 John F Di Leo
John F Di Leo is a Chicagoland-based trade compliance trainer, transportation manager, writer and actor. His columns are regularly found in Illinois Review.
And it was the leftist world court who persecuted elderly Pinochet. The same world court that would love to parade US soldiers and politicians before it.
the savior of Argentine sovereignty and culture
You meant Chile, right?”
Asked and answered ... check my reply upthread ... ;>)
Now THAT is funny!! *LMAO*
Allende was elected. The left is back at it in Chile so the solution is not easy: A firm enforcement of existing laws as well as infiltration of the leftist organizations that would do harm to the public once in power. They just don’t give up that power once they’re voted out. Just ask Bolivia.
Great article; thanks for posting.
Gen. Pinochet bump.
Is that for real?
How did your conference with the teacher go?
Thanks for the kind words, folks, and for the correction on my timeline error.
I crafted that paragraph a couple of different ways in my head (having a bit of trouble that night deciding on which examples to list), and in my final version, I mixed up the timelines between Mao’s China and Pol Pot’s killing fields. I meant to say that the Cultural Revolution was fresh in everyone’s mind, and the killing fields were about to occur...
I agree completely that it was a stupid and embarrassing error. As soon as I saw your notes here, I got my original column on Illinois Review corrected, but of course I can’t edit something once it’s up here on freerepublic.
Thanks for the catch, patriots!
No big deal...but thanks much for posting the article about one of the greatest Cold Warriors
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.