“Maybe you’ve heard of Wikileaks. All of the emails are indexed and searchable.”
Of course, I know all about it. It shouldn’t be that hard to produce the emails you made claims about since they’re all online and easily linked to. Unless you can’t produce them, or they don’t actually contain what you claim.
“Here. I’ll do your legwork for you...
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39459";
Ok, so you produce an email about a 95 year old grandma that asked someone who is friends with Podesta if he can set up a meeting with Obama? That is your proof of some child sex trafficking conspiracy?
“but don’t ask again”
I’ll keep asking unless you actually produce something, or admit that you can’t produce it. Or you can give up and just stop replying to me.
“There is a voice analysis...”
Hahaha. Ok, sure, I’ll bite. Where is this “voice analysis”. It’s from some actual credentialed professional and not just a random kook on the internet, I’m sure.
But back to the actual point, where are these emails that say what you claimed they say?
If you get any closer you will contract rabies. You can almost see him frothing at the mouth.
“I’ll keep asking unless you...”
How about you start by examining the ONE email, instead of demanding I do your homework for you?
“Ok, so you produce an email about a 95 year old grandma that asked someone who is friends with Podesta...”
Pull your pants up and stop exposing your ignorance in public. It’s disgraceful. Frankly, I would have trouble looking in the mirror if I displayed such a ridiculous combination of arrogance and ignorance. Get help!
Tamera Luzzatto wrote that email. She isn’t 95. She’s 62. And she was Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff from 2001 to 2009 (otherwise known as the Benghazi years, or the wiped server years, if you prefer).
I’ll make this very simple so that even a simpleton can follow:
What is Thelema?
If you can’t take the time to examine a single email objectively, then you are less than a waste of time. I’ve been nice up to this point.