Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan Constitutional Carry Bill Advances ^ | Oct. 24, 2019 | Chris Eger

Posted on 10/24/2019 2:41:55 PM PDT by PROCON

“This legislation simply allows law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights,” said the bill’s sponsor. “Protecting yourself should not be a criminal activity.” (Photo: Chris Eger/

A Michigan bill that would drop the need to get a special license or permit to legally carry a concealed firearm passed a key committee vote this week.

State House Bill 4770 passed out of the House Military, Veterans and Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday. The measure makes a host of changes to Michigan’s weapon laws, the most polarizing of which is to repeal the requirement to have a license to carry a concealed handgun for those not otherwise prohibited from possessing one.

“It’s time we end the restrictions put on those asserting their God-given right to self-defense,” said the bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Steve Johnson, R-Wayland. “Constitutional Carry will reduce barriers to our most vulnerable populations and ensure they have the ability to protect themselves and their families.”

Michigan currently requires training, a background check with fingerprints and a $100 application and licensing fee to obtain a concealed pistol license (CPL), a process that can take weeks. The state had 660,920 active CPLs as of August according to statistics from the Crime Prevention Research Center.

Johnson’s measure would remove the requirement to get a CPL but still allow those who want such a license to obtain one, which would still be useful for reciprocal purposes. It would also protect legal carry in places where either open carry or concealed pistol license holders are already currently allowed.

“This legislation simply allows law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights,” Johnson said. “Protecting yourself should not be a criminal activity.”

Gun control advocates were dismayed at the HB 4770’s progress, with Bloomberg-backed Moms Demand Action saying it was “dangerous legislation.”

The bill would still have to clear a floor vote in the House, pass through the Senate and be signed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, to become law. Nonetheless, if HB 4770 is successful, Michigan would join the growing ranks of states that recognize permitless carry. So far in 2019, Kansas, Oklahoma and South Dakota have all passed legislation to codify carry without a permit.

TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitutionalcarry; michigan
But will Democrat Gov. Whitmer sign it?
1 posted on 10/24/2019 2:41:56 PM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List

This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.

2 posted on 10/24/2019 2:42:27 PM PDT by PROCON (When we allow 'progressives' control of the language, lies replace Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Possibly not, but it’ll put her on record at just the right time.

Snyder already deep-sixed similar efforts so no point worrying about that.

3 posted on 10/24/2019 3:04:06 PM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


That gun in the pic sure looks like a military weapon. Prolly full auto too.

4 posted on 10/24/2019 4:02:02 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

It’s a Glock, I have a Sig in FDE. My everyday carry weapon. Maybe I should turn it over to Beto?

5 posted on 10/24/2019 4:31:34 PM PDT by offduty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Why do people, who have paid back their debt to society, not able to protect themselves with a firearm. If they are such a threat, why are they released? Why doesn’t gooberment fund the ATF so we can determine which non-violent felons should have a right to bear arms?

6 posted on 10/24/2019 6:39:22 PM PDT by Demanwideplan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demanwideplan

Correct. Anyone who can not be trusted to be armed should not be running around loose.

7 posted on 10/25/2019 9:04:47 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson