“after Podesta threatened to kill the person that leaked the Clinton Emails”
Ugh, that old story again. That email Podesta sent was years before the leak of the Clinton emails, and it was specifically referring to job applicants who were leaking info on the DNC, and what Podesta wanted to do to them to stop those leaks. There was nothing about “killing” anyone in the entire email chain.
18 months is not “years” (Email was dated 2/22/2015) Your contention is accurate, but the real point is what Podesta conveyed with regard to “making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it”.
I’m sure Podesta wasn’t referring to banning them from Starbucks.
“the real point is what Podesta conveyed with regard to “making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it”.
I’m sure Podesta wasn’t referring to banning them from Starbucks.”
You can see exactly what Podesta was referring to if you actually read the email chain, because they talk about how they want to “make an example” of a suspected leaker in the immediately preceding email in the chain that Podesta was agreeing with:
“I think Robby rightly says that a lot of our leaks are coming through job searches we’re doing. I think every conversation has to either begin or end by telling people if you’re name appears in print as a result of the conversations the job is off the table.”