Posted on 09/22/2019 4:55:59 PM PDT by GuavaCheesePuff
They have a dark horse. Why isn't Bullock mentioned?
I’m guessing not everyone has seen that story.
The party has moved so far left that even a progressive like Biden is too moderate for them. It’s going to be Bernie or Warren.
How about no one with the gravitas to beat Trump. Warren most likely as Obama destroyed the Demonicrats for his own ego.
Boogers for president
true - will ping to incpen
Because the nominee will have to be black and female. Harris, no, Abrams, no, lets see, Michelle, now your on track.
Because the nominee will have to be black and female. Harris, no, Abrams, no, lets see, Michelle, now your on track.
He’s almost left-wing enough to be a Republican you’d support for office in Jersey, Puff.
Sorry I almost forgot, Hillary in blackface.
The current front runners are corporatists pretending they are left of Marx. Each one of them is at risk of peaking too soon. Kamala Harris is polling 6% in California, 4th place in her home state. She is next in line to have no chance of winning the nomination. It looks like Bullock's long term, long shot strategy is that if the current front runners burn out, then centrists candidates move up.
Take Biden down, dirty up and Trump and she dreams she's in like Flynn.
Horse or horse’s ass?
Michael obama with orca winfrey as his VP
I’m really surprised Eric Holder hasn’t joined the race.
Bullock is an utter moron. He can barely read a teleprompter. And it isn’t a given that he would even carry Montana.
The trial lawyer hacks are bankrolling him, but they will deep six him for someone viable soon enough.
Over Weightfrey
Yup. 20 to 1 bet in the U.K.
U.K. bookmaker Ladbrokes allows people to put money on the race.
And according to Matthew Shaddick, head of their political betting division, the former first lady and secretary of state is currently leading the pack when it comes to the number of bets people have made.
“We’re baffled, to be honest,” Shaddick told Newsweek.
“We’ve taken more bets on her to be the Democratic candidate than any of the other runners,” he also said.
U.K. bookmaker Ladbrokes allows people to put money on the race.
And according to Matthew Shaddick, head of their political betting division, the former first lady and secretary of state is currently leading the pack when it comes to the number of bets people have made.
“We’re baffled, to be honest,” Shaddick told Newsweek.
“We’ve taken more bets on her to be the Democratic candidate than any of the other runners,” he also said.
The site currently has Clinton’s betting odds at 20 to 1.
https://www.lifezette.com/2019/09/hillary-clinton-dem-nomination-2020-british-bet/
Michelle Obama will be the Democratic nominee.
She will not have any of the recent outrageous ultra left proposals the current candidates have made to get primary votes. She will be seen as a safe moderate. There will be nothing for Trump to attack.
Biden was put in to take out Sanders by splitting the old white vote (men in particular). He did his job...but he will have to hang on for a few more months....that’s why Trump wants to take him out now.
Michelle is a black woman. That’s a 2-fer as far as democrats are concerned.
Democrats loved the Obama presidency the way they loved the Kennedys.
No one will get to the convention with enough delegates to win it on the first ballot....it will be a “brokered convention.”
Michelle is the most dangerous candidate that Trump could have to run against.
Its obvious. Michelle will be the nominee.
Beer goggles
Haven’t you figured it out yet???
Lieawatha. Guaranteed....if Biden drops out he’s got super delegates
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.