It's been pointed out that specific laws have been broken, but you ignore them.
You and Trey.
The public mouths "rule of law," but doesn't really have a clue what that is. They imagine it to be a certain thing, but apply ZERO legal analysis. Just state the conclusion, and viola, it must be so. TREASON! TREASON!
Straman fallacy. Just because people falsely claim "treason", doesn't mean that there weren't real laws that were broken.
I believe I have considered 100% of the particular statutory violations posited.
It is true that I tend to ignore you.