Posted on 09/12/2019 5:52:09 PM PDT by cotton1706
Sen. Ted Cruz will oppose President Donald Trumps nominee for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, Halil Suleyman Sul Ozerden, a major setback for the embattled nomination.
Cruz (R-Texas) has informed the White House and colleagues this week that he will oppose Ozerden, according to three people familiar with the Judiciary Committees internal dynamics. That conservative opposition places in doubt the future of Ozerden, who is a close friend of acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, and whose nomination Mulvaney pushed over the objections of the White House Counsel's office.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
All of South Carolina’s Congressional delegation are Cheap Labor Express stooges.
I don’t know why none of them side with the citizens and the rule of law.
Someone in the Federalist Society probably owes Ozerden a favor.
Tell me about it - and that nutcase governor who fell in love with the chick who has the Brazillian?
I guess the GOPe simply OWNS the process there.
Lurking in the back my mind also.
Re: “Lets not go back to having Republican Judicial nominees become leftist activists after they take office.”
Too late - for Trump’s District Court nominees, anyway.
105 - District Court Appointments
31 - Voice Votes (usually means unanimous Democrat support)
26 - At least 30 Democrat Senators voted “Yes”
54% - Percent of Trump’s District Court nominees who got Heavy or Unanimous Democrat support.
Trump’s Circuit Court record is better, but still unnerving.
21% - Percent of Trump’s Circuit Court picks who got at least 20 Democrat votes.
One of Trump’s nominees for the Ninth Circuit - Mark J. Bennett - got 27 Republican “No” votes!
Who is Petersen?
Spell check error!
You have personally researched the decisions of all 150? You're aware that the leftist creep usually starts more than a year after nomination, right?
Look at the important one, the SCOTUS.
All the Federal levels are vitally important. To think otherwise is a huge waste of resources and a crapshoot, since the nation keeps getting bigger and minting more lawyers and activists, but the SCOTUS is limited to a certain number of cases it can logically hear; unless you want most SCOTUS cases to be handled primarily by their law-student clerks, because that's what will happen if we keep expecting every case to have to go to them before basic Constitutional principles will be definitively upheld by the appellate courts in clear Constitutional terms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.