Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz will oppose Trump's judicial nominee
Politico.com ^ | 9/12/19 | BURGESS EVERETT, MARIANNE LEVINE and ELIANA JOHNSON

Posted on 09/12/2019 5:52:09 PM PDT by cotton1706

Sen. Ted Cruz will oppose President Donald Trump’s nominee for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, Halil Suleyman “Sul” Ozerden, a major setback for the embattled nomination.

Cruz (R-Texas) has informed the White House and colleagues this week that he will oppose Ozerden, according to three people familiar with the Judiciary Committee’s internal dynamics. That conservative opposition places in doubt the future of Ozerden, who is a close friend of acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, and whose nomination Mulvaney pushed over the objections of the White House Counsel's office.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 116th; cruz; elections; judges; judiciary; ozerden; trump; trumpjudiciary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: cotton1706
I agree that we need a REAL conservative.
From the article:
41 posted on 09/12/2019 9:02:29 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

All of South Carolina’s Congressional delegation are Cheap Labor Express stooges.
I don’t know why none of them side with the citizens and the rule of law.


42 posted on 09/12/2019 9:03:56 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Someone in the Federalist Society probably owes Ozerden a favor.


43 posted on 09/12/2019 9:05:56 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Tell me about it - and that nutcase governor who fell in love with the chick who has the Brazillian?

I guess the GOPe simply OWNS the process there.


44 posted on 09/12/2019 9:07:33 PM PDT by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Was it an Islamic wedding?

Lurking in the back my mind also.

45 posted on 09/13/2019 1:57:52 AM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds upd all the CPU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Re: “Let’s not go back to having Republican Judicial nominees become leftist activists after they take office.”

Too late - for Trump’s District Court nominees, anyway.

105 - District Court Appointments

31 - Voice Votes (usually means unanimous Democrat support)

26 - At least 30 Democrat Senators voted “Yes”

54% - Percent of Trump’s District Court nominees who got Heavy or Unanimous Democrat support.

Trump’s Circuit Court record is better, but still unnerving.

21% - Percent of Trump’s Circuit Court picks who got at least 20 Democrat votes.

One of Trump’s nominees for the Ninth Circuit - Mark J. Bennett - got 27 Republican “No” votes!


46 posted on 09/13/2019 3:49:36 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Petersen would be another Souter.

Who is Petersen?

47 posted on 09/13/2019 9:21:23 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Spell check error!


48 posted on 09/13/2019 9:44:35 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
All Trump nominees turned out well so far and I think this would be no different.

You have personally researched the decisions of all 150? You're aware that the leftist creep usually starts more than a year after nomination, right?

49 posted on 09/13/2019 10:53:43 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Look at the important one, the SCOTUS.


50 posted on 09/13/2019 11:38:43 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Look at the important one, the SCOTUS.

All the Federal levels are vitally important. To think otherwise is a huge waste of resources and a crapshoot, since the nation keeps getting bigger and minting more lawyers and activists, but the SCOTUS is limited to a certain number of cases it can logically hear; unless you want most SCOTUS cases to be handled primarily by their law-student clerks, because that's what will happen if we keep expecting every case to have to go to them before basic Constitutional principles will be definitively upheld by the appellate courts in clear Constitutional terms.

51 posted on 09/13/2019 1:18:36 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson