Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Bolton -- a 'great American' -- served Trump well
Fox Business News ^ | September 10, 2019 | Lou Dobbs

Posted on 09/10/2019 9:14:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

There is a widening differential between the America as described by the national, left-wing media and the America in the world in which most of us live.

And a commensurate gap between President Trump's historic accomplishments and the caricature of the president drawn by both the leftist media and the radical Dems who so viciously attack Mr. Trump in the mad, continuing obsession to not only to block his agenda, to slow his achievements, to somehow, no matter how vicious or craven the means, prevent his reelection in 2020.

The president, at this critical moment, has successfully maneuvered the Chinese into a new reality that replaces their now-defunct obsession of world domination. Iran understands the economic power of America and understands because of President Trump. They don't want to ever test our military power at all.

Afghanistan, North Korea and the worldwide deployment of our troops are the legacy of decades of American arrogance and inertia of bureaucracies that have inhabited our state department for years, and visionless leaders in the White House.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bolton; condiproglobalist; condiprotegeetroll; howisweatherinkiev; kievrose; limeypropagandist; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: rintintin
What's unfair is labeling Bolton a nee-con when he is actually a hawk. There is a huge difference between the two.

And, just about everyone, even most prominent Democrats were behind the Iraq war at one time.

61 posted on 09/12/2019 7:54:36 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Neocon, warmonger, dame difference

Bolton was not a hawk. Reagan was a hawk, he favored a strong defense but didn’t actually start any wars , unlike what warmonger Bolton wanted to do.


62 posted on 09/12/2019 7:58:28 AM PDT by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rintintin
What do you think Reagan did to Libya after a terrorist attack? He took bombed it.

Reagan also funnel weapons to the contras in Nicaragua to combat communists there.

He also armed and financed the mujahideen, in Afghanistan from 1979 to 1989 to undermine the Soviets.

Any problem any of that?

63 posted on 09/12/2019 12:36:13 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

No problem with any of that, none of which was an invasion. It was totally different from the all-out wars that Bolton advocated for. Reagan started no wars


64 posted on 09/12/2019 12:53:03 PM PDT by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson