Lets see. In your world we have to choose between being able to own private property or having the government force us to use our resources and spend our money to promote any random message anyone out there wants to spout.
It isn't enough that the speaker can distribute their message any way they like and can afford. No, we need the federal government to make sure everyone listens to their words.
But doesn't that cause a problem for "communications systems", you ask?
Since the government is forcing them to publish anything anyone wants them to without curation doesn't that mean that the system will be flooded with crap and the owner's investment will be trashed?
Well, technically yes, but never fear.
We'll have wise men deciding for us exactly which private property will be confiscated and exactly which messages must be broadcast.
For instance, there's this communications system called Free Republic but it's in favor with the current Secretary of Compelled Publishing so not to worry. He doesn't like liberal speech so the "owner" is still allowed to ban posters. I'm sure the next Secretary will have the same wisdom.
Do not deliberately misstate my position. I have explained it to you enough times that you understand it, so don't go trying to claim I want to do this to everybody.
Communications companies are a special case, because they control something of vital interest to the United States.
They control speech.
It isn't enough that the speaker can distribute their message any way they like and can afford. No, we need the federal government to make sure everyone listens to their words.
When they control mass communications. Yes. They must be forced to allow everyone to use their communications equipment. Absolutely. Just like the Telephone company.
For instance, there's this communications system called Free Republic...
And here you go again. I've addressed your attempts to introduce "Free Republic" in your defense of trillion dollar corporate fascist-nazis controlling speech, and I tell you "Free Republic" is too small and insignificant to warrant any intervention. Furthermore, "Free Republic" is effectively a "club", and it makes it clear to everyone that it is effectively a political club.
When you are big enough to cause freedom of speech issues for a significant portion of the population, you are big enough to be barred from censorship. When you are not, you are not.