The title of this article should be on billboards all around the country.
If I was confident that Mueller does not have sex with barn animals I would have said so.
So, basically what mueller is saying is the POTUS is BELOW the law.
Thanks for the post, I enjoy free canada...
Proving innocence is impossible. There can always be hidden and unknown actions that would prove guilt if they were known.
Proving guilt is possible when proof of criminal activities are tied inextricably to the defendant.
Abstract thinking aside, this is EXACTLY how it works in Left, Far Left, Socialist and Communist countries: Guilty unless you can prove you are innocent.
The Mueller investigation began with the claim of a crime. The president was assumed guilty. All that remained was to demonstrate his crimes with evidence. There was none.
Even though the investigation did not find that the charges against him were valid, innocence could not be proven because there remained unsubstantiated accusations. The entirety of the second half of the report is fraught with these rumors, false accusations, and unsubstantiated charges.
The conditions that instigated the investigation remained largely in tact by its end. The president was not guilty, neither was he innocent. These are findings inconsistent with American jurisprudence.
For over two years, now, they have been breaking the rules and laws, that most of normal Americans abide by, in their self-serving attempts to prevent the American voters from electing the President that the Democrats didn’t like and to remove him from the Oval Office after he was duly elected.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They have been getting away with it because on January 20, 2009 both parties allowed an ineligible usurper to take the oath of office as President in violation of the Constitution.
The Kenyanesian Usurpation was an eight year long crime spree.