Afghanistan Veteran.
B.A. in Public Relations from Wayne State University.
Double minor in new media and comms.
Current affairs enthusiast. World traveler.
So if Comey and his Rats can claim that paying off a blackmailing bitch is a “payment in kind” against federal election law, isn’t a banning by a private software company a similar payment to Trump’s opponents?
After all, if we’re going to make elastic laws, let’s go for it.
https://twitter.com/genebrownusa
Afghanistan Veteran.
B.A. in Public Relations from Wayne State University.
Double minor in new media and comms.
Current affairs enthusiast. World traveler.
Around 160 official US Govt agencies have Twitter accounts through early 2014. There are probably many more.... I have not found a comparable list of Facebook accounts, but it has to be enormous.
Why would the US Government use a company that openly fights free speech? They need to be de-legitimized by an executive order forbidding ANY US Gov Facebook or Twitter pages.
FYI——TRUMPS’S SOCIAL MEDIA HUD COMPLAINT NOW IN MOTION SAYS: Facebook mines extensive user data and classifies its users based on protected characteristics. Facebooks ad targeting tools then invite advertisers to express unlawful preferences by suggesting discriminatory options. Among those options are physical disabilities, parents with children and even religious practices advertisers are allowed to show their ads only to people Facebook deems interested in Jesus or the Christian Church, for example. Those practices could violate the Civil Rights Act, HUD said in the complaint, dated August 13.
NEEDED NOW: Trump Ex/Order.....”no govt agency shall have an account on social media if that company does not allow free speech.”
Ping.
Oh, wait, I'm on the conservative side of things.
Never mind. It'll never fly.
/sarcasm