Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2019 7:43:23 PM PDT by GeneBrownUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GeneBrownUSA
https://twitter.com/genebrownusa

Afghanistan Veteran.
B.A. in Public Relations from Wayne State University.
Double minor in new media and comms.
Current affairs enthusiast. World traveler.

2 posted on 05/08/2019 8:04:16 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GeneBrownUSA

So if Comey and his Rats can claim that paying off a blackmailing bitch is a “payment in kind” against federal election law, isn’t a banning by a private software company a similar payment to Trump’s opponents?

After all, if we’re going to make elastic laws, let’s go for it.


3 posted on 05/08/2019 8:06:08 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GeneBrownUSA
I'll post your boan-fides, kid.   face 

with tears of joy

https://twitter.com/genebrownusa

Afghanistan Veteran.
B.A. in Public Relations from Wayne State University.
Double minor in new media and comms.
Current affairs enthusiast. World traveler.

4 posted on 05/08/2019 8:06:21 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GeneBrownUSA

Around 160 official US Govt agencies have Twitter accounts through early 2014. There are probably many more.... I have not found a comparable list of Facebook accounts, but it has to be enormous.

Why would the US Government use a company that openly fights free speech? They need to be de-legitimized by an executive order forbidding ANY US Gov Facebook or Twitter pages.

FYI——TRUMPS’S SOCIAL MEDIA HUD COMPLAINT NOW IN MOTION SAYS: Facebook mines extensive user data and classifies its users based on protected characteristics. Facebook’s ad targeting tools then invite advertisers to express unlawful preferences by suggesting discriminatory options. Among those options are physical disabilities, parents with children and even religious practices — advertisers are allowed to show their ads only to people Facebook deems interested in “Jesus” or the “Christian Church,” for example. Those practices could violate the Civil Rights Act, HUD said in the complaint, dated August 13.

NEEDED NOW: Trump Ex/Order.....”no govt agency shall have an account on social media if that company does not allow free speech.”


6 posted on 05/08/2019 8:17:19 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GeneBrownUSA; semimojo

Ping.


7 posted on 05/08/2019 10:00:31 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GeneBrownUSA
In-kind contribution! In-kind contribution!

Oh, wait, I'm on the conservative side of things.
Never mind. It'll never fly.

/sarcasm

8 posted on 05/08/2019 10:08:13 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson