1 posted on
04/18/2019 4:14:49 AM PDT by
EyesOfTX
To: EyesOfTX
It would be sweet to see Barr put Rosenweasel in handcuffs and frog march him from the podium at the conclusion of today’s presser.
2 posted on
04/18/2019 4:21:49 AM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: EyesOfTX
It would be sweet to see Barr put Rosenweasel in handcuffs and frog march him from the podium at the conclusion of today’s presser.
3 posted on
04/18/2019 4:21:51 AM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: EyesOfTX
The curtain will next come up on Act II, which will begin with the issuance of the report by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz on the rampant abuse of the FISA process that took place throughout 2016 and into 2017, as Obama officials within the DOJ and FBI furiously tried to prevent Trump from winning the election and then attempted to stage a coup detat after he took office. Nice.
4 posted on
04/18/2019 5:00:10 AM PDT by
Principled
(No one will conquer America, from within or without, until its citizenry are disarmed.)
To: All
Self-dealing congressional Dems....Jabba the Nadler, Mad Maxine Waters, Da Nang Dick Blumenthal and Bug-Eyed Adam Schiff.....
tripped over each other rushing to the nearest TV camera to whine about Barr holding a press conference prior to he Mueller report's release
(something every other AG in American history would also have done).
5 posted on
04/18/2019 5:02:43 AM PDT by
Liz
( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: EyesOfTX
If Barr has been AG all along instead of Sessions, this whole stupidity would never have happened.
The libs will treat all the negatives in the Mueller report as conclusions in a court of law. But the Muller report is a prosecutors document rather than a legal judgement.
11 posted on
04/18/2019 5:40:31 AM PDT by
djpg
To: EyesOfTX
I think Donna Brazile moved to FOX News as part of a witness protection program. #SethRichMurder #HillaryGotTheQuestionsAheadOfTheDebate #DonnaWasScaredSpitless
12 posted on
04/18/2019 5:45:27 AM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: EyesOfTX
There will be millions of legal scholars hit Twitter today.
How could Trump obstruct an investigation Comey told him didn’t exist?
13 posted on
04/18/2019 5:56:22 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(I was nervous like the third chimp in line for the Ark after rain had started falling.)
To: EyesOfTX
...New York Times Maggie Haberman on Twitter contend that the Mueller Report should speak for itself and that the AG is attempting to usurp congresss solemn duty to interpret the report for the American people... How can it "speak for itself" if you want Congress (read: Dems) to interpret it, Maggie?
BTW, I saw an ad on the Banes & Noble website where you can order the report...
14 posted on
04/18/2019 6:04:05 AM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: EyesOfTX
Democrat politicians and fake journalists are the equivalent of political vampires: Transparency is their sunlight; truth is their garlic; they recoil from honesty exactly the same way Count Dracula recoils from the Christian Cross. Perfect analogy.
16 posted on
04/18/2019 6:10:56 AM PDT by
workerbee
(America finally has an American president again.)
To: EyesOfTX
18 posted on
04/18/2019 6:17:55 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: EyesOfTX
Notice that as soon as Barr took over as Attorney General and Rosenstein was no longer overseeing Mueller's team of “investigators” the hunt for evidence of “obstruction” came to end and Mueller was told to wrap it up and write his report.I'm sure that Mueller's staff presented the novel theory that there was no crime or collusion but there is grounds for obstruction they just needed to keep digging for it and be allowed to cast an ever widening net against anyone who ever dealt with the President.I'm sure they suggested being allowed to go back during last 10 years and sift through all their tax information and business dealings because we will find something if we're allowed to keep looking. I think Barr came in and asked what they had and would have none of that and decided since there is no underlying crimes there is nothing to obstruct wrap it up and write it up.I'm sure there will be in the report “Although there is no verifiable evidence a reasonable person could conclude...”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson