Notre Dame Fire Deemed ‘Accident,’ But Here’s What the Media is Not Telling You

24News ^ | 04-15-2019 | Jenn Carter

[montag813]

by Jenn Carter

On Monday, the world reacted in horror as the nearly 900-year old Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris was nearly completely destroyed by fire.

Horrific flames quickly engulfed the entire core structure, and after 2 hours, the iconic spire collapsed, along with most of the roof and its 210 tons of lead.

That's what we know.

Here's what we don't: What caused it?

Well the media seems to have focused on one reason, and one reason only: the cathedral was "under construction" -- a reported $7 million project lasting years, and scheduled to complete just this year.

Therefore the most logical reason, absent obvious foul play, is a "construction accident."

FoxNews and most other nets treated it as such:

Given the scope of the renovations, it is quite likely a "welding spark ignited paint thinner" or any other cause widely speculated in media reports, that can typically occur on a busy construction site.

But there's just one big problem with that.

Two hours after the spire collapsed, French-Greek journalist Sotiri Dimpinoudis reported that there were no construction workers onsite at the time of the fire:

[TheConservativeTejano]

When we are told that it definitely wasn’t arson before the fire has been completely extinguished that tells us only that the authorities are saying whatever they think will prevent the most problems.

Partner, even the MSM can not even comment on this fire as to whether it was Arson or accidentally set on fire.