[chuckles]

Your example sounds similar to other statements of mathematicians that have reckoned the possibility of self generation by accident to be so remote it is impossible. One,( I think from Russia) said if a mutation occurred every second of the building blocks supposedly available in the soup, there hasn't been enough time in the largest number of years claimed by science for the smallest virus to be formed. Then he expounded on this astronomical number and said, if randomly a combination of these chemicals came together to make a virus right off the bat, it would be hundreds of billions of years later to make the next viable virus in complexity. Even mathematicians knew the amount of zero's after 10x was so large, they all said it represented impossibility.

They all had to admit that the odds of the virus living long enough or the bacteria living long enough to have food to eat or a mate to mate with was also impossible. Even an asexual example eating his own would never change into something else to have some other example to eat or mate with, so no evolution. All of these "scientific" claims of evolution cannot be shown possible with math. The claims made by non mathematicians about evolution are just their imaginations and cannot be shown possible by math.

[Bob434]

good summary- the following follows up on that thought:

“The major links in the molecules-to-man theory that must be bridged include (a) evolution of simple molecules into complex molecules, (b) evolution of complex molecules into simple organic molecules, (c) evolution of simple organic molecules into complex organic molecules, (d) eventual evolution of complex organic molecules into DNA or similar information storage molecules, and (e) eventually evolution into the first cells. This process requires multimillions of links, all which either are missing or controversial.”

https://trueorigin.org/abio.php