“The constitutionality of which was upheld by the Supreme Court in their 1862 Prize Cases decision.”
Just to be clear, are you saying the Union Supreme Court during the war voted to approve of the Union war?
You should add: and after the war the Union Supreme Court voted to say both the Union war and the Union Supreme Court was right all along.
And you should add: and later the Union Supreme Court voted to approve killing babies regardless of race, color, or creed.
You must be so proud.
Not at all. I'm saying that the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a act of Congress which happened to be used to combat the Southern rebellion. Sorry if that wasn't clear to you.
You should add: and after the war the Union Supreme Court voted to say both the Union war and the Union Supreme Court was right all along.
You could say that. I would say that after the rebellion was over the United States Supreme Court had a chance to rule on the constitutionality of the Southern acts of unilateral secession and determined that they were, in fact, unconstitutional.
You must be so proud.
Your contempt for the judiciary is duly noted, and is in keeping with the attitude of the Davis regime towards the third branch of government as well.