Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: logi_cal869

Here’s an even better paper outlining a 2-parent/citizen standard (I forgot to throw this up last night):

https://www.scribd.com/doc/300919680/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-the-natural-born-Citizen-Term-in-Our-U-S-Constitution

Enough of this English law BS I keep hearing (snopes et al) arguing that parents can be aliens.


143 posted on 01/31/2019 6:21:41 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

Vattel never used the term “Natural Born Citizen”. Anyone who cites Vattel for a definition is ignorant of reality. He didn’t use the term.

10 years after the Constitution was approved, a translation of Vattel translated “indigenes” as NBC. Indigene, then and now, refers to an indigenous person. Nothing to do with NBC.

If the Founders had followed Vattel, they would have required the President to be a “native” or an “indigene”.


144 posted on 01/31/2019 6:51:44 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson