Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity
And Lee had the major advantage of being able to fight the entire war on the defensive if he chose, whereas the north had to take the offensive.

Not if he wanted to accomplish his objective, which was to win independence for the South. The North could keep sending men at him till his army was destroyed, and Lee knew it. His only hope of accomplishing his goal was to diminish Northern will to keep the war going, and the only way he could do that would be to make them think it was either unwinnable, or not worth the cost of winning. That's what his foray into Pennsylvania was all about. He meant to convince Northern civilians that not only was the South not defeated, it was capable of launching a foray into their territory. The reality was that they were near the end of their rope from resource exhaustion.

Had a few things gone differently, Lee may very well have pulled the whole thing off. He had some compounded bad luck.

76 posted on 01/17/2019 11:50:02 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

a pretty good synopsis of Lee’s thoughts on the Pennsylvania campaign.

I would disagree on one point. IMO, the mistakes that Lee made before and during the Battle of Gettysburg, coupled with the fact that Meade made few mistakes during the battle resulted in the defeat of the Army of Northern Virginia at Gettysburg. I do not think bad luck was the reason for the failure of the Pennsylvania campaign.


84 posted on 01/17/2019 2:52:41 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson