Skip to comments.
'A sword hanging over our heads': Trump discovers new weapon against media
The Politico ^
| November 16, 2018
| Jason Schwartz and Gabby Orr
Posted on 11/16/2018 11:08:59 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 last
To: Yosemitest
Let’s take the entire original comment:
11/17/2018, 1:16:42 PM · 79 of 100
ro_dreaming to Yosemitest
The President, and the Executive branch, are not part of Congress.
They can make any regulation they want.
“They” refers to the President and the Executive Branch.
Quit trying to be a putz.
101
posted on
11/19/2018 5:33:29 AM PST
by
ro_dreaming
(Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
To: ro_dreaming
Then you just clarified yourself to another senseless comment:
The President, and the Executive branch, are not part of Congress.
They can make any regulation they want.
They refers to the President and the Executive Branch.
So .. what you said is clarified to:
They [the President, and the Executive branch] can make any regulation they want.
Well, since WHEN does
"the President, and the Executive branch" have ANY AUTHORITY to make ANY regulation ?"
Congress makes regulations, in accordance with the United States Constitution.
The President (as head of the Executive Branch) either APPROVES OR VETOS those regulations (called bills) Congress makes.
After the President approves those BILLS, then they become LAWS.
Now go sue the organization that you got your FAULTY education from.
102
posted on
11/19/2018 9:57:18 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
Have you not heard of Executive orders?
And, you, dear Freeper, is why I wish Free Republic had an “ignore” button.
Good day.
103
posted on
11/19/2018 11:34:55 AM PST
by
ro_dreaming
(Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
To: ro_dreaming
Let's get into the technicalities of FROM WHERE the authority of an "EXECUTIVE ORDER BY THE PRESIDENT".
To quote your clarification, you wrote
"They" [the President, and the Executive branch] "can make ANY regulation they want."
That is
NOT TRUE.
Let's go to the part that IMPLIES the President can issue what we call "Executive Orders" located in
ARTICLE II, SECTION 3, of the United States Constitution :
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union,
and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient;
he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them,
and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;
he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers;
he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,
and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
Here is what
"the Congressional Research Service" states on page 1 of their report :
" ... Presidents have historically utilized various written instruments to direct the executive branch and implement policy.2
These include executive orders, presidential memoranda, and presidential proclamations.
The definitions of these instruments, including the differences between them, are not easily discernible, as the U.S. Constitution does not contain any provision referring to these terms or the manner in which the President may communicate directives to the executive branch. ... "
Now that being PROVEN, let's get back to the erroneous statement you wrote
"They" [the President, and the Executive branch] "can make ANY regulation they want."
Executive Orders HAVE LIMITS and that has been proven also.
"The Congressional Research Service" states in their introduction that :
The Presidents authority to issue executive orders does not include a grant of power to implement policy decisions that are not otherwise authorized by law.
Indeed, an executive order that implements a policy in direct contradiction to the law will be without legal effect unless the order can be justified as an exercise of the Presidents exclusive and independent constitutional authority.1
So to summarize that:
Any executive order MUST IDENTIFY whether the order is based on the powers given to the president BY the U.S. Constitution
or delegated to him BY Congress.
And :
Executive orders are subject to legal review,
and the Supreme Court or lower federal courts can nullify, or cancel, an executive order if they determine it is unconstitutional.
Similarly, Congress can revoke an executive order by passing new legislation.
104
posted on
11/19/2018 5:35:31 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
You have been placed on the auto-ignore list of ro_dreaming.
Have a nice day.
105
posted on
11/20/2018 5:28:53 AM PST
by
ro_dreaming
(Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson