Here we go...recounts with counties using different standards. What could go wrong? /s
I don’t remember hearing about crap like this until 2000 in Florida.
Here we are, in the era of smartphones and cloud computing, and we get election snafus more often than in the days of paper ballots.
This is SOP now. The dems must have paid consultants who are ready to tweak elections anywhere, any time.
Here is the process. The large counties withhold their final tally until all other counties report and certify their tally. Then the large liberal democratic counties know how many votes/ballots need to be found with the right percentage of republican votes to democratic votes. this way the democrat will win with a small enough victory to not make it look too suspicious.
The Sate of Washington has perfected this process. The state law specifies elections within 1% must do a recount. Then the state specifies that after the second recount there cannot be another recount for any reason short of fraud. so Rossi won within the mandatory recount level and, after some ballots were found in a closet, he still won the recount by a small margin that also requires a second recount. Miracle of miracles more boxes of ballots were found and the democrat (forgot her name) won. Since no more recounts are allowed by her winning could not be challenged.
Since some of the precincts, after the second recount, were reporting 110% of voter turnout the Republican party sued. Lost in state court and in the state supreme count.
After the Al Gore-Bush debacle in Florida George Soros stated emphatically that the democratic party must begin to focus on the election of Secretary of state positions in all states. That is who certifies the election and they need to be in control.
It is a science. probably taught at Harvard.