Chief Diversity officer = Chief Discrimination officer
If we really wanted to abide by the equal protection clause. university admission processes should require that race, religion and name of the applicant be redacted when admissions officers review applications. They should be irrelevant to the process as there only reason for being on that form is to ennable the admissions officer to discriminate on the basis of race and religion and national origin
The function of a college chief diversity officer is to ensure that all students have a welcoming environment that does not cause them undue stress due to the student’s race, religion, gender or other such characteristics. They achieve this by making sure that the students self-segregate and are taught to hate each other.
A whole lot of kids show up to college without realizing “the others” hate them and without hating “the others”.
Someone (the CDO) needs to sort them out
* blacks over there
* women in this area
* gays here
* ...
Then tell each group that the other groups are prejudiced against them and the “straight white male” group hates all the others.
Then there needs to be training for the kids on how to recognize microaggressions and sexual harassment. Most of these “offenses” are unnoticeable without training and many of the acts would even be appreciated by both parties without the training (e.g. a woman may want help carrying a heavy box, but a man is only allowed to help other men).
Then there’s training on symbols. Not many kids know the plastic rings that hold soda cans together resemble a noose. Or that a banana peel means the person who threw it away thinks that blacks are monkeys. These symbols need to be taught.
And there is often a fierce battle for the title of “most oppressed”. The CDO needs to make sure the university hires trained/experienced referees to make sure the battle is fought fairly. For example, if it ends up the banana peel was thrown out by a white person, your group gets 10 points. But if investigation finds a black person accidently left it there, you don’t get the points. It can be a tricky call, especially when there’s no evidence either way - it’s obviously blamed on a white male in that case, but the LGBT group that’s running neck-and-neck in the battle for “most oppressed” may object to awarding the points to the other group.
After that, the CDO has a lot of work trying to make the groups get along. It’s a difficult and underappreciated job.
They accomplish nothing of any value. They destroy the values on which the country was founded. They attempt to destroy White Christian Heterosexual males.
What Do College Chief Diversity Officers Accomplish?
They keep a chair seat nice and warm, piss away thousands, Bullshit in the extreme, lie their ass off when questioned about accomplishments, and fatten their own bank accounts .
They make sure the children of White Liberal Elites are always at the top of the heap and that many talented capable black and brown students are demoralized by having to compete with people who outmatch them.
In short they do the opposite of what they’re suppose to do...
Jobs for otherwise unemployable relatives of the “connected”?
Foe one thing, and I know this for fact, they keep blacks who turn in nothing and fail all exams from being flunked out. They ensure failing students at least get a D grade.