I think that is an inappropriate “choice”.
The other human that deserves full consideration besides the monther, when it comes to abortion, is the human in the womb whose life would be taken by abortion. That is the principle moral matter regarding abortion.
The issue of a “father’s rights” might have some merit, but it will also NOT address the principle issue - the life of the unborn child - and it will become a sidetracking of that as debates get bogged down in the secondary matter of the father. I say secondary given that the principle rights of the unborn ALWAYS apply whether or not the father is around and whether or not the father cares to have an opinion.
Be that as it may, it is a choice that IS being made.
Furthermore, it’s about time we “sidetracked” the debate because your approach HAS BEEN LOSING FOR 50 years!!!!