Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

We the undersigned have been honored to have been listed, along with Justice Gorsuch and Judge Kavenaugh, as the people the President of the United States would consider for nomination to SCOTUS. But in light of the experience of Judge Kavenaugh, undergoing the gauntlet of the senate confirmation process in its modern form is a mixed blessing indeed. Each of us signs this letter in solidarity with all our colleagues, each of whom would be honored to serve on SCOTUS but none of whom actually needs to be a justice of the SCOTUS.

In any other context than confirmation to SCOTUS, of course, any of us would be honored to meet any member of the United States Senate. But in light of the regrettable experience of Judge Kavenaugh and his family, the modern form of the confirmation process - which is almost entirely a 20th Century innovation - is obsolete. The Senate is on notice that, should any of the undersigned be honored by nomination to SCOTUS,

  • the nominee will not visit any senators.
  • the nominee will not meet with any committee of senators.
  • the nominee will not appear on TV with the president. And,
  • the nominee will withdraw his name from consideration if the Senate or any committee thereof discusses the nomination on TV.

The nominee will respectfully respond to written interrogatories from the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary.

Respectfully submitted,

. . .


1 posted on 09/23/2018 10:13:47 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: boxlunch; ransomnote; IChing; Bratch; laplata; chiller; ebiskit; TenthAmendmentChampion; Obadiah; ..

Ping.


2 posted on 09/23/2018 10:16:42 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

the nominee will withdraw his name from consideration if the Senate or any committee thereof discusses the nomination on TV.


So one Senator can kill a nomination by mentioning it on TV?


3 posted on 09/23/2018 10:23:27 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I would agree, except for the fourth item. Also, I would add that since the advice and consent envisioned by the Constitution did not, and does not, require referral to a committee for hearings and testimony by the nominee, hearings hereafter shall be dispensed with and the nomination be considered directly by the full senate.


5 posted on 09/23/2018 10:43:02 AM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Just send them a postcard.

Dear Senate,

"We are sick of your shit."

Sincerely,
America

9 posted on 09/23/2018 11:20:25 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I don’t like that entirely. I think the list of potential nominees, who, are already judges, and have been confirmed before,should say, “Look back at my confirmation. Nothing has changed.” .....or note what has changed.

Allow no questioning except by letter.

This unhinged Democrat cabal has got to be headed.


14 posted on 09/23/2018 5:20:12 PM PDT by jch10 (Kavanagh: the last " R " to accept a presidential nomination, ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson