THat’s the worst part of this accusation. I was reading NR and David French said that this could get cleared up if the other people who were “at the party” come forward.
But how can any of the other people at the party “come forward”, especially to say none of this happened? We don’t know when the party was, or where the party was, or who was at the party.
So are we going to collect the statements from every person who remembers attending any party over the space of two years where any one of these people were present, and then ask them if they remember seeing all three?
And since the story is “this happened in private, and I then slipped out without anybody seeing me”, even if we did find people who vaguely remembered some party from 35 years ago, how are they going to say “yes, I am certain the three of them never disappeared at the same time, and I am certain I saw the woman leave through the front door?”
They could find people who could say all of that. The dems would whether true or not. It’s time to start playing ball with their rules and find witnesses who could have been on the moon at the time. Who cares? Under oath? Why not? It doesn’t have any meaning anymore...