Yeah, sometimes they emphasize the company’s obligations to the “stakeholders”, which is a far more encompassing and socially aware term than “shareholders.”
Some thing any body that has been paying attention all ready knew.
Lessay you really, realllly knew your stuff about business:
WHY would you be at a business school, teaching concepts about business..?
Aren’t biz schools staffed by people who were interested in business, but couldn’t hack it..?
Yep. I met with one of my old mechanical engineering professors this past summer. He is now the Dean of the department. In our conversation and reminiscing about the old days, he told me to be thankful that I went thru when I did. I asked: “Why’s that?” He showed me the new undergraduate engineering curriculum, and it had a full 18 semester-hours of additional “social justice” classes!!!! The engineering department initially protested it, but in order to keep their national accreditation, they had to add them. Basically, they were blackmailed into adding them. To accommodate the additional 18 hours of brainwashing, they had to cut some of the technical electives that would have been taught instead.
I asked him if all the “advanced basket weaver” curriculums had to add 18 semester-hours of basic engineering and he said; “No. They don’t. They’d never pass.” IF left unchecked, the insane Left will totally destroy this country. They are the BORG of this century.
It’s going to invade and consume every single thing.
Yes, and it’s in the sciences too. Science is no longer the unbiased pursuit of truth - it’s the slanted, deliberate promotion of leftist ideology.
Hence their continuous and tiresome virtue signaling.
That is why Marxism and its odd offspring and successor, Post-Modernism, is such a powerful religion to them.
Here in Indiana the State Bar Association is meeting this month to determine whether to make “diversity” classes a mandatory part of a attorney’s continuing legal education. I kid you not.
But I bet they still hit them up for large donations all the time.
Leftists know that controlling education is by far the biggest bang for the buck. It’s been paying off as the indoctrinated graduates are filling positions of influence. Why wouldn’t they ramp it up even more. As long as people still pay big bucks to have their chidren programmed with leftist ideology, they’ll reap the benefits.
Differently that???
Probably meant to use "than" but that than would be wrong, too. From.
The woman probably has little understanding of statistics, even if she is skilled in the math. As a business process analyst, I never trust scary metrics in isolation. If inequality is too high, how much inequality is okay and why? What is the trend of real income?