“The previous regime wasn’t engaged in a racially motivated democide.”
Are you saying that the Apartheid government did not engage in ‘democide’ against non-whites?
That’s exactly what they’re saying. Can you point to any mass murder perpetrated by the apartheid government? Apartheid was not a good thing at all, it was racist, and no good. However, that’s where it ended. It was not a genocide or any type of mass murder. It was just brutally separatist. And given the absolute savagery of the ANC in Africa in the 1970s, not entirely unjustified.
Apartheid ended 25 years ago. Since that time more South African white people have been murdered then we lost in the entire Vietnam War over a roughly similar time frame. Ten thousand more.
The apartheid regime had many objectionable policies. I am not aware that sanctioned mass murder was among them.
The apartheid regime was much like the Jim Crow south. There was a lot wrong with it.
The ANC regime is akin to the Bolshevik regime just as Stalin’s people were taking over.
Do not even *attempt* to pretend the two are equally bad. One of these is manifestly worse than the other, but the West steadfastly refuses to see that because of PC.
Apartheid is 30 years dead and buried. The people being oppressed by the new regime had nothing to do with it, but they will be punished. Because they’re white.
> Are you saying that the Apartheid government did not engage in ‘democide’ against non-whites?
That’s the actual in-reality fact.
It’s a testament to the depth which you have been propagandized that this was not self-evident to you.
Do you really think that if the Apartheid government had done such a thing, you wouldn’t already know all the gory details and have heard them repeated ad nauseam by race baiting axe grinders?