Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

apparently the FISA court judge has no problem with the fact that false evidence was presented to them. I can’t imagine why /s.


23 posted on 08/11/2018 5:27:56 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: gibsonguy
-- apparently the FISA court judge has no problem with the fact that false evidence was presented to them. I can't imagine why /s. --

The FISA gig is a gravy train for the judges. The assigned judges get a break from their usual work, travel to Washington at taxpayer expense, best rooms and food for free, and are put in a work environment that (unlike their usual work) is totally walled off from public view.

They are true believers in the law as the most perfect system devised by man, and they are proud to be part of such an edifice. I'm convinced they honestly believe what they are doing is meaningful and valuable. I still see it as a charade to fool the public. We got along without FISA up until 1970 whatever it passed, so we can get along fine without it. FISA does not curtail snooping, and that is the ONLY purpose it has, to make the public believe snooping is controlled, curtailed, and only done for justifiable reasons.

The vast majority of snooping is done without a warrant, and outside of FISA.

28 posted on 08/11/2018 5:44:49 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson