[TXnMA]

"I’ll leave the Q games to those who enjoy such pursuits. I’ve no interest in it myself."

Now, that's a fair enough position! :-)

Sadly, others -- with no more research or understanding of the Socratic method than you -- immediately launch into denigration of and snarkiness toward those who do understand.

From somewhere in my past I can draw on familiarity with Mil-Intel lingo and methods -- and on some ability with spatial and graphic analysis -- and have extracted much valuable evidence -- starting with "clues" which might be senseless to you...

Indeed, not all are suited for intel/psyops efforts...

But all have the choice of being civil toward their fellow FReepers...

FRegards,
TXnMA
 

[higgmeister]

From somewhere in my past I can draw on familiarity with Mil-Intel lingo and methods -- and on some ability with spatial and graphic analysis -- and have extracted much valuable evidence -- starting with "clues" which might be senseless to you...

Indeed, not all are suited for intel/psyops efforts...

But all have the choice of being civil toward their fellow FReepers...

And that is why I keep an open mind. I have not followed Q much at all. But, I was an Air Force Telecommunications Systems Controller and held a Top Secret clearance for six years. I am retired from Verizon (legacy MCI) after 31 years. Ten years of that as a PMI and ITIL certified Project and Program Manager. Just out of the Air Force I worked a year and a half both at ITT and then at Sprint. With my background I am familiar with a few narrowly known lexicons that the average person would be amazed by. Your description of your familiarity seemed to reflect my own but I went further than you with my background.

Here is one hint: I knew of the fall of the Soviet Union two years before it came to pass. That was only a matter of time too.

I keep an open mind and try to be civil.