Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: grumpygresh

“There was a case in Minneapolis where a LEO shot a fleeing suspect in the back as the suspect reached for his firearm while he was running away. I don’t think that happened here.”

Well, he was armed, he did flee from the vehicle and refused to follow orders, and you can clearly see in the video he keeps moving and refusing to keeps his hands up and out of his pockets. I really can’t fathom why so many people seem to think a person wouldn’t get rightfully shot by police in that situation.


16 posted on 07/31/2018 11:15:25 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

You probably cant fathom the controlling legal authority in the state setting up an illegal ambush around a blind curve to force an intentionally flushed suspect into the ditch either. Or the OSP refusing to ID themselves behind masks and firing on both vehicles without provocation at the “initial stop”.

What about maybe one of the members of the FBI Hostage Rescue Teams firing upon the still moving truck with no “hostages” in it, and then lying about it on his report? Can you at least fathom that?


17 posted on 07/31/2018 11:51:18 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Splodeyhead is the only cure for MAGAphobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson