Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: NobleFree
"Wrong - if the narrowed war on drugs could be won, then it would no longer be true that its primary effect is to enrich criminals."

That's not and never has been the purpose of those laws.

"Who profits from rape, and how?"

Ask people involved in sex trafficking.

87 posted on 07/17/2018 8:15:22 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj
Wrong - if the narrowed war on drugs could be won, then it would no longer be true that its primary effect is to enrich criminals.

That's not and never has been the purpose of those laws.

Red herring - whatever the INTENT, the primary EFFECT of an overly broad prohibition is to enrich criminals.

Who profits from rape, and how?

Ask people involved in sex trafficking.

The ones who commit the rapes in that context are not the ones profiting - and if consensual prostitution were legal, the market for trafficked women would be greatly reduced if not eliminated. And a great many rapes involve no profit whatsoever.

Who profits from assault and battery?

91 posted on 07/17/2018 8:56:52 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson